Friday, September 30, 2011

"There's nothing noble about being superior to some other man. The true nobility is in being superior to your previous self."

--Hindu proverb"

http://hellogiggles.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/IMG_3292-714x476.jpg

It's best when you outdo yourself. Its hard not to focus on the other person. But then they may just bring you down to their own level. Our politics is infested with people worried about how well the other person is doing and what they got in comparison to you. That's too bad since it could help lift both all of us up and make life better for the next generations to come.

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

"Kids in Africa have more information today than the President of the United States did 15 years ago."

-- Ray Kurzweil*


The pace of change accelerates even to the furthest reaches of the world (or at least what used to seem like the furthest reaches of the world). If an African kid is advantaged relative to Bill Clinton circa 1996, then the U.S. needs to be moving faster in order to keep the challenges and challengers at bay.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

"Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts."

- Sign hanging in Einstein's office at Princeton*



If Einstein knew this, why don't so many others who seem to believe that quantifying things give us the results we need when there are many elements that aren't easily quantifiable that tell us part of the picture.

To give just one example, can you really measure the dynamism of an organization based on its quarterly or even annual profit figures? Can it be dynamic without great results at the moment? Aren't results sometimes non-linear? And isn't this, perhaps, proof of a dynamic organization (i.e. if the results are linear, like the results of GE under Jack Welch's years, are proof that something's not quite right)?

Just wondering.


* hat tip, Tom Peters tweet
We like to think that every big leap in technology was the result of technical ingenuity. The following story from Steve Levy's new book on Google suggests some real "off-line" solutions can have big on-line improvements.

A legendary story at Google illustrated this principle. Around 2002, a team was testing a subset of search limited to products, called Froogle. But one problem was so glaring that the team wasn’t comfortable releasing Froogle: when the query “running shoes” was typed in, the top result was a garden gnome sculpture that happened to be wearing sneakers. Every day engineers would try to tweak the algorithm so that it would be able to distinguish between lawn art and footwear, but the gnome kept its top position. One day, seemingly miraculously, the gnome disappeared from the results. At a meeting, no one on the team claimed credit. Then an engineer arrived late, holding an elf with running shoes. He had bought the one-of-a kind product from the vendor, and since it was no longer for sale, it was no longer in the index. “The algorithm was now returning the right results,” says a Google engineer. “We didn’t cheat, we didn’t change anything, and we launched.”

Levy, Steven (2011). In The Plex (Kindle Locations 1255-1262). Simon & Schuster. Kindle Edition.

Friday, May 20, 2011

Do the Republicans really want to win the presidency? Why should they? They're chances of reaching their goals are greater without the White House while the Democrats can take the blame.

The key elements of this...
-the deficit which will stay high even though its the legacy of the Bush Administration
-a filibuster to prevent major inroads if the Democrats keep control of the Senate
-a further of undermining of people's confidence in the government since while it would seem the pro-government types are in control things aren't getting all that much better.
-defunding the key components of the health care legislation so it looks ineffective and weak and proves that the legislation was a power grab that resulted in everyone being worse off.
-Obama fits this deceptive narrative well -- his personality, that he's African-American, even as he's not able to rally his own side.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Excellent post at Brad DeLong's blog on how higher education doesn't compete so much on price as on quality / reputation / inputs of various sorts. As he points out, there are aspects in which this input focused model of competition resembles the health care market (if you can get the best doctor you're less price sensitive).

Costs and competition in higher education

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Good Bill Schneider piece on the importance of energy prices in influencing the public mood. He's generally a cautious prognosticator yet he argues to expect Republicans to be exposed to a similar reaction on their focus on the deficit as the Democrats faced on health care in 2009. Watch out.

Remember back in 2009, when President Obama insisted on talking about health-care reform when the country wanted to hear about jobs? That was the Great Disconnect, and Democrats paid a price for it. Now House Republicans insist on talking about national debt while the country wants to hear about gas prices. Welcome to the Great Disconnect, Act Two.

.

Saturday, April 23, 2011

What do we want?

What kind of society do we wish for? Do we wish to get along with our neighbors? Do we wish to trust that if we engage with our local merchants that they stand by what they sell us? Or do we prefer that we all do whatever we can to make more money? Do how others live and have available to them opportunities impact me? If I treat someone awfully, even if not in front of the world, does that not affect everyone's wealth? Do we not all have some obligation to each other, as challenging as that may be?

Or are we all an island and whatever we do, if we can be helped by it that's the way the world works and you better just get used to it? If we shade the truth, well, everyone else will too. If we see an opportunity to get ahead, sue someone, or do something else that might affect someone else's well-being, they're problem?
Is it really conservative to be "anti-government"?

Saturday, April 9, 2011

Glad it wasn't in the control of the government, this information. What matters, after all is incentives, which are perfectly aligned with consumer's interests.


AN ARTICLE in this week’s Economist reports on the theft of data from Epsilon, a marketing-services company that sends out more than 40 billion e-mails a year on behalf of many of America’s biggest companies. It seems an outsider managed to get hold of the e-mail addresses and names of some of the individuals whose details are held on Epsilon's systems.

If a flood of dodgy e-mails does now appear, it will certainly damage the reputations of the firms that gave Epsilon their customers’ data. Many of them, including Marriott International, a hotel chain, have been quick to blame the marketing firm for the leak and to alert their customers to the risks. But this may not be enough to spare them from criticism. “Given the size of Marriott, why would you trust a third party to have this [customer] information in the first place?” wrote a disgruntled commenter on the hotelier’s website.”



dangers of sharing emails

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

According to George Packer,

"What underlies so many of Obama's decisions,is an attachment to the institutions that hold up American society, a desire to make them function better rather than remake them all together."

Its all about the institutions being able to function well to meet their challenges.

Monday, April 13, 2009

A Tom Peters Manifesto



Our Credo/A Work in Progress


*We are thoughtful in all we do.
*We are excellent listeners—to each other and to all members of our extended family (vendors, customers, communities, etc).
*We will make the four words "What do you think?" an automatic instinct in all of our internal and external dealings; moreover, "What do you think?" will precede the explication of our own view in 99 out of 100 instances.
*We are dedicated to and measure our success to a significant degree by our unwavering commitment to the extreme personal growth of every one of our employees.
*We will only be "delighted" with our managers if their employees are universally surprised by the level of their personal and professional growth.
*We will be clear that we view leadership at every level as a sacred trust—and that leaders are indeed the servants of their employees just as the effective classroom teacher is servant to the lives and growth of her or his students.
*We believe in the "inverted organization chart"—with the "leaders" at the "bottom" of a reverse pyramid.
*We will construct leaders' incentive schemes so that measureable progress in human development is weighed as highly as marketplace success.
*We will be a leader in research and development in every aspect of our business—and we will work primarily with vendors who are also fanatical about research and development; and work to attract a set of core customers willing to play at the edge of things and become our co-developers.
*We will aim to make our customer engagements adventures beyond the comfort zone, or adventures in growth to use a less intimidating phrase—we will aim to add value in novel ways that surprise and stretch our customers and ourselves.
*We will use the three words "Try it! Now!" almost as often as "What do you think?"
*We revere the experimental method, and believe success is mostly correlated with the number of things one tries.
*We wholeheartedly acknowledge the value of analysis, but in the end swear by "Actions speak louder than words."
*We "encourage" failures; that is we acknowledge that a near-religious devotion to "Try it! Now!" necessarily invites the failures that are part and parcel of trying new things.
*We will, in fact, look askance at those whose records include few or no failures—such a spotless record suggests an unwillingness to brave the unknown.
*We will, to summarize the last few items, all view ourselves as explorers-adventurers, proceeding toward individual and collective growth by actively engaging at the edge of things; we unstintingly believe that our customers will reap enormous value from our commitment to our constant, restless exploration.
*We will encourage and insist upon constant and vociferous disagreement, but be absolutely intolerant of disagreement in the form of personal attacks.
*We will cut "overhead" to zero—every "department" shall aim to be best-in-class in its arena, and hence a full-scale participant in our concerted effort to add value in all we do.
*We will exude integrity, individually and collectively.
*We will exemplify the word transparency in all of our internal and external dealings—and bend over backwards to give new meaning and breadth to the term "information sharing."
*We will individually and collectively accept blame for our mistakes, or even our rather minor contribution to others' mistakes—and apologize accordingly and with dispatch.
*We will bring to bear overwhelming and instant and collective force to redress any customer problem, real or imagined.
*We will under no circumstance badmouth a competitor.
*We will aim to turn every customer contact into a memorable experience, remembering that all of life is indeed a stage.
*We honor the word "design" in all we do, in every nook and every cranny of our organization; every system, every web page, every customer invoice, every employee restroom is part of our purposefully designed "signature," and stand out and exude exceptionalism in one way or another.
*We understand that difficult decisions must be made, but we will bend over backwards to implement such decisions with kindness and grace—the dignity of the individual will always be foremost in our mind.
*We will not intrude into our employees' lives, but we are committed to aggressively helping employees achieve a healthy lifestyle.
*We will master the art of appreciation and be profuse in our use of the words "thank you" to honor assistance of even the most minor sort.
*We will acknowledge through celebration even small successes—and always cast a wide net in our "thank yous" to include bit players, especially from other functions.
*We aim for others to always be surprised by our "vibrancy" and "vitality"—we view enthusiasm as the key to success in anything, and take particular care in leader selection to ensure that every one of our leaders is a "remarkable" "carrier" of enthusiasm through thick and, especially, thin.
*We will drop whatever we are doing and rush to the aid of those involved in tight-deadline activities—even if those involved caused some of their own problems.
*We will be careful in our planning, but also understand that nothing ever unfolds as planned—hence we will be known for our ability to muster resources in an instant, without fuss and from everywhere, to deal with the unexpected; participating in these ad hoc response activities will not be seen as a distraction from our "real work," but as a significant part of our "real work" and an opportunity to contribute to others and build our own skills in ways we might not have imagined.
*We fully acknowledge that other units-departments-functions have other points of view than ours, but we will bend over backwards to develop social connections with those in other functions so that dealings over warring perspectives are dealings among friends.
*We acknowledge that agreed upon deadlines are holy writ, and will attempt to balance requisite urgency and requisite realism in all of our commitments.
*We will fight tooth and nail to minimize the complexity that "necessarily" comes with Growth and the mere passage of time.
*We will declare total war on our own systems to insure that they do not strangle us.
*We gladly acknowledge that anyone in the organization has the duty as well as the right to challenge anyone else when he or she believes they have a valid and useful perspective to offer—this is particularly true regarding any issue that has to do with safety, quality, or meeting agreed upon deadlines; such challenges may be firm but not rude.
*We will be civil in all our dealings with one another.
*We will bend over backwards to bring truly (not superficially) diverse views of every stripe imaginable to bear on plans and decisions of all sorts.
*We will pursue "diversity" in part so that the composition of our workforce and leadership from top to bottom is a "pretty good" reflection of the demographics of the markets we serve or aim to serve.
*We will use new technology tools to extend the definition of "our family" to every corner of the globe—we will welcome ideas and participation in our affairs from anyone and everyone.
*We will aim for gender balance in all we do and from tippy top to bottom—for reasons commercial more than reasons moral.
*We will never, in any way, compromise on the quality of our products or services—regardless of difficulties in our marketplace and economy.
*We wholeheartedly acknowledge that in the short term (as well, obviously, as the long term) we must be profitable and exhibit stellar financial performance that is consistent with the audacious efforts to serve our people and our clients as described above.
*We aim to be seen by others as "conservative" in our financial practices.
*We shall talk about EXCELLENCE constantly.
*We shall unfailingly aim for EXCELLENCE in all we do.
*We shall use EXCELLENCE as the principal benchmark in the assessment of ourselves and our work and our community.
*We shall never forget that the bedrock of EXCELLENCE is the unwavering commitment to growth of 100% of our employees—and, in fact, all of those we come in contact with.

Sunday, April 12, 2009

ala David Allen

"If you can't run with the big dogs, stay on the porch." - Big Dog stores.

Saturday, April 11, 2009

Israel’s Election System Is No Good

Problem when prescribe for wrong problem.
Real problem for Israel -- threshold for getting elected representatives in an election (its way too low meaning very small percentages of votes can get representation leading to a fractious system and votes for those on the fringes)

Friday, April 10, 2009

ala David Allen
gtdguy: "What worries you, masters you." - Haddon W. Robinson